Saifedan twisting published data and using insults instead of arguments doesn't really create confidence with me. He's the one that enforced the hodl, digital gold, store-of-value narrative. Maybe we should question his stance, his alliances?

Now we can and should question the authenticity of the publication, but you can not just get rid of the content that tells us Adam went to the Island while Gavin rejected collaboration. You need to explain more than that.