Damus
Lyn Alden profile picture
Lyn Alden
@LynAlden
One of the big macro questions is when will the US banking system run into the liquidity floor, requiring the Fed to end quantitative tightening? Due to current regulations and the "ample reserve" regime, banks generally have liquidity requirements relative to their overall size, and their overall size keeps growing nominally.

-Big banks ran into the liquidity floor in September 2019 at $1.5 trillion with the repo spike, and the Fed had to end quantitative tightening and resume mild quantitative easing (which was then overshadowed by the giga-liquidity-bazooka in 2020/2021).

-Smaller banks ran into the liquidity floor in March 2023 at $3.0 trillion (the new floor) with the regional bank crisis. Both the Fed and the Treasury provided liquidity in response, although the Fed has maintained quantitative tightening. Liquidity has been maintained above that level without being greatly elevated, which is probably what would have happened post-2019 if not for the pandemic/lockdown stuff thereafter.

The New York Fed thinks the liquidity floor will be reached sometime in 2025, and that they'll go back to gradual balance sheet expansion then. Andy Constan, formerly of Bridgewater, thinks it'll be late 2025. I debate him a bit on this since both of us cover this closely, and I generally think it'll be mid 2025, although there are enough moving variables that neither early 2025 or late 2025 would surprise me, so conservatively I say "by the end of 2025."

I was talking to a large institutional investor today, and he said that his contact who is a major repo operator at an investment bank, thinks the current floor is now $3.3 trillion, which is roughly where it is currently. That basically means any further quantitative tightening has to be offset by reverse repo drainage, or they'll have a repo issue and the Fed will need to end QT. My estimate is somewhere in the $3.1-$3.2 trillion range for the liquidity floor, meaning I think there's a bit more room than that repo operator. But either way it's pretty tight.

This is all kind of rambling but generally when that liquidity floor is reached and is responded to, it tends to be good for a lot of liquidity-driven assets, including bitcoin. And it'll probably be with a whimper more than a bang, kind of like the September 2019 repo crisis that nobody other than macro nerds remember.


6133❤️188🤙54❤️6🔥3👀2💜2
modulo · 86w
Andy…now there is a name from the past
Wallingford · 86w
This is probably a dumb question, but I'm trying to grasp the mechanics. Why were larger banks hit harder in 2019? Higher rates drive down bond values, but that reduces the denominator. Was it primarily variance in assets between the two classes of banks? That's the story told for the recent regio...
AJBarefoot · 86w
I feel like nostr:npub14mcddvsjsflnhgw7vxykz0ndfqj0rq04v7cjq5nnc95ftld0pv3shcfrlx . I’ve listened to nostr:npub1a2cww4kn9wqte4ry70vyfwqyqvpswksna27rtxd8vty6c74era8sdcw83a explain the reverse repo equation (multiple times on Peter’s show alone), and still can’t explain it like I know what I’...
Gokay · 86w
"giga liquidity bazooka" will be my new anon nickname
DevinNButterBall · 86w
Giga-liquidity-bazooka is my favorite macro term
Lighthouse · 86w
Nerd
Greg · 86w
Me (reading long nerdy macro posts): Soft chuckle Wife: What? Me: Nothing stops this train.
James Lavish · 86w
When asked about the QT runoff of Fed balance sheet assets at a presser this past spring, I recall Powell stating that ample bank reserves would be approximately 10% of GDP. Then this quote from Fed Governor Christopher Waller, back in January 2024, said 10% to 11% of GDP would be “an approximate ...
Micael · 86w
Remember when the Fed lowered the “reserve ratio” to cero during 2020? @LynAlden Does that mean the credit multiplier limit its infinite?
Ben Ewing · 86w
Hi Lyn, got a question. If the fed was forced to do balance sheet expansion again, wouldn’t this have to be offset by fiscal tightening in order to keep the USD at a rate that didn’t increase inflation (especially if there were also rate cuts)?
Narwhal Tacos · 86w
So Tether isn’t the new liquidity floor? Asking for a friend. Cuz I got nothing.
James Ypma · 86w
Thanks Lyn. Took multiple reads for my gorilla brain to understand but you got me there.
Brian · 86w
If my dumb ass replaced the word "liquidity" with the word "money" in your note, how far off would I be?
Andrew Gomez · 86w
https://m.primal.net/KUij.jpg
nostrich · 86w
In a geometrically expanding debt system where interest on debt owed on one loan must be paid from new debt, it is not possible to stop the debt expansion , except for some very temporaryy moments, unless you want to crater the economy. The choice is inflate to be moon ,and eventually hyperinflate, ...
EVERYTHING · 86w
Beautiful thesis Lyn, my general question therefore remains, why would the global price of bitcoin go up when it's the US causing the expansion, as opposed to say Egypt's form of QE in Egyptian Pounds. Sorta seems like the price increment globally depends on what only the Fed or Tether does Do you...
SilverNeo · 86w
The issue is there are no consequences for the elites If you create a crisis like 2008 who cares the taxpayer will bail us out. And this time is going to be worse as the us dollar is closer and closer to losing its status as a world reserve currency. For this, there are many reasons such as weapon...
Jake Woodhouse · 86w
On the one hand I love finding these kind of insights, as it helps to understand what is actually going on On the other, one of the very best things of HODLing Bitcoin, is that one doesn't need to care... Buy it. Store it. Go do whatever you want!
MrDecentralize · 86w
HODLing Bitcoin is the ultimate strategy, and BTCFi empowers users to earn yields through Bitcoin staking—without giving up custody. This is the way!
Victor Stabile · 86w
TLDR; orange coin good
Dakota · 86w
Ngu? Ngu. https://image.nostr.build/b644639403949740b695a8b2c35aee429e8f77832c4c9bfe7c198ca0d0e54755.gif
₿uy the dip! 🌽🌎🟠 · 86w
Lyn you are amazing! Thank yo for the insight on this.
Rajesh · 86w
Those satanic banking families do seem to like the “33” number
Pran ⚡ · 86w
So BTC pump in 2025? Aligns well with previous cycles.
brian flounders · 86w
wish i understood more of this. but i always learn when lyn speaks.
DesertNomad · 86w
nostr:nevent1qqsyc6kswmdn2wwhacas5stt6j5te95evfhdmqx53sfsy57x5shfn5qpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5hsygzqe2ndz25zyv4ej3utdrp9zhs3k20xr660vpj4c48a3z0ktq7kpupsgqqqqqqs6hkpc8
TheBitcoinBreakdown · 86w
What are the chances the 2019 repo spike and covid are related? As an excuse to flood liquidity.
MineBTC · 86w
Short term we have the PBOC expanding it's balance sheet and headwinds for the $ it seems first with Yelen wanting to weaken it and then with a possible trump election. Would you agree the $ will likely keep correcting going forward? The way I understand it is it will likely waken in the short term ...
OldmanCrypto · 86w
Thanks Lyn, now I know what the giga -liquidity bazooka is - it’s simply the turning on of the money printing machine😎
Tito Vasquez · 86w
Nice
Rand · 80w
nerd be4 & nerdnow t-y
Adam A · 78w
Great insight - add banks to the list of entities that depend on ever expanding liquidity alongside foreign nation states. I find it interesting that both large and regional banks hit the liquidity floor at different times. One might reasonably expect one or the other to have a structurally lower fl...