It seems like we have more in common than you think, I’m also very supportive of decentralizing mining and supporting new alternative implementations, (although I do run BIP-110 on my Knots node).
...
I just generally feel it's divided two groups of people who otherwise all agreed than mining centralization is bad. But yes I'm aware from the technical side of things there isn't a huge gulf.
But whatever, Bitcoiners fighting Bitcoiners is how we do things. Especially in bear markets.
I don't entirely look forward to trying to get mempool filters to be the norm again once we solve the centralization issue. I do think many on the 110 side don't see the importance of keeping transactions in the p2p network rather than just seeing those miners get paid even more for running slipstream and similar platforms. I also think too many on the Core side seem to be throwing in the towel rather than seeing rolling back datacarriersize as a tactical retreat.
And I think we've all given Citrea far more publicity than their shitty rollup deserves. It's not central to this, and it's not worth doing anything over.
But whatever, Bitcoiners fighting Bitcoiners is how we do things. Especially in bear markets.
I don't entirely look forward to trying to get mempool filters to be the norm again once we solve the centralization issue. I do think many on the 110 side don't see the importance of keeping transactions in the p2p network rather than just seeing those miners get paid even more for running slipstream and similar platforms. I also think too many on the Core side seem to be throwing in the towel rather than seeing rolling back datacarriersize as a tactical retreat.
And I think we've all given Citrea far more publicity than their shitty rollup deserves. It's not central to this, and it's not worth doing anything over.
1❤️1