Hint: Are they capturing and storing the likeness of minors? The laws at every level of government on capturing, storing, using the likeness of minors in private spaces are restrictive for a reason and failure to comply can be expensive.

It's an interesting idea, but for the most part filming in public, and things viewable from public typically have no reasonable expectation of privacy. The novel concern is the data extractable through aggregation that exceeds what a normal person would consider reasonable. For example, in constit...

Might as well ask for ring as well

Looks like a recent geo-fencing case just came down by the supreme court as well: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-112_0am4.pdf

nostr:nprofile1qqsxzpn9q3shaeunsuppuxxgn7me68wmc0nmluvu7g5c7szxd7r3t6g0ndrx7 the public space argument holds for one camera and falls apart at scale. a thousand plate readers with retention gives you a searchable history of where everyone drove, and nobody consented to that version of it.