whats the cleanest path for a non dev to actually review it, read the walkthrough and trust the diff, or spin up knots and watch BIP110 behave against real mainnet data?

nostr:nprofile1qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq36amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wvf5hgcm0d9hx2u3wwdhkx6tpdshsqg8a6h50dtsdhqtmuzm3mgsynrqcq6tgmznyt92ecfylxgh6wdry5uw47y8r let's do a proper fix. 1MB blocksize as explained in https://primal.net/a/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzps2sgvvvj475s4536lhnxc4lenw0u7aattpu5tclsrzrhgfznverqqjr...

Simple and elegant solution.

https://github.com/ordinals/ord/pull/4545

Save Bitcoin. Run Knots mine with Ocean!

BIP110, a clever distraction from central banks buying up bitcoin, like FTX's Sam Bankman-Fried, a globalist pawn.

The only thing BIP110 actually creates is a centralization of power into a single person YOU. Keeping code short doesn't justify an authoritarian attempt to dictate protocol rules for the entire network.

+1 for BIP-110. However we think we need to revisit witness discount at the very least. Because now bytes are not priced equally. It breaks 1=1 rule of identity and distorts free fee market. See initial proposal: https://primal.net/a/naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzps2sgvvvj475s4536lhnxc4lenw0u7aattpu5tclsrzrhg...

NO.

I don't think I've heard anyone argue that it's BIP110's code complexity that's the problem, it's what changing the code does or could do that people have issues with. A single lines change could easily have procedural, cultural, and game theory changes, both known and expected, and unknown and unex...

shitfork liar nostr:nevent1qqsvwxur99dpn7euhuq0vrspkr3j7q3fpanlmemcfr7eguzavrs64qq5jlymc

BIP110 just reminds me of those throwers in high ranked competitive video games.