Damus
Open in Damus

Recent Notes

rambler · 1w
Without Dr. Luthers reformations you would still be walking around in the darkness in fear whipping yourself on the back, not even being allowed to read the bible, incapable of free thought
Tilde · 1w
That is an interesting take. We should just have stuck to trading indulgences I guess.
Tony Acid · 1w
Child
Gregor · 1w
Got it, truly hope this works out, thank you for the work.
Cypherpunk BTC BR · 1w
RDTS como MASF é um risco à privacidade, pois centraliza dados sensíveis. Um sistema descentralizado é mais seguro.
Kyma Fi · 1w
The study had no solution. Honestly it’s probably the underlying problem with getting people to leave the fiat system as well (since it’s a programmed belief in authority). Personally, I try to stay way from ad hominem as much as possible and avoid logical fallacies (very hard to do on nostr l...
abu ruqayyah · 1w
Data storage to bitcoin how
Luke Dashjr · 1w
No, because a counter-fork to reject RDTS would be explicitly protecting the ability to force others to distribute child porn.
 Luke Dashjr profile picture
Luke Dashjr @Luke Dashjr
Core30 intentionally enabled attackers to force every Bitcoin user to distribute CSAM.
This is a fatal wound because nobody is going to be willing to use Bitcoin if it requires them to do that.
(Remember, Bitcoin only works if _most people_ are using full nodes.)

RDTS rejects/undos the changes Core30 made. It prevents the CSAM attack.

Rejecting RDTS requires creating a counter-fork like Bcash.
To oppose or reject RDTS is therefore an explicit action to enable people to force CSAM on Bitcoin.
Therefore, if someone actually tries to reject RDTS, the name of their fork is Bpedo.
610❤️33❤️3🤙3🚀2👀1💜1
AU9913 · 1w
The more you talk about CSAM the more I think you're going to be the one who actually puts it on the blockchain after your fork.
Marcus Satbard · 1w
shitfork liar nostr:nevent1qqsvwxur99dpn7euhuq0vrspkr3j7q3fpanlmemcfr7eguzavrs64qqpz4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wchsygxwm2uphepw737mmejn7ja84vj6cw4r9n7zkeewurufcra03qh38cpsgqqqqqqsjctmpw
Tony Acid · 1w
CSAM is already on Bitcoin. Is the fork going to remove it?
Gregor · 1w
How will RDTS deploy, by UASF?
kubernetes · 1w
Rejecting RDTS can be accomplished very simply by ignoring it. There's no chance that it gets adopted beyond fringe Knots fan communities.
sister_sam · 1w
How is not equivalent to saying anything that supports arbitrary data "forces CSAM" including any data or miscellaneous data field of any kind? Clearly massively overblown claim.
Luke Dashjr · 1w
Core30 intentionally enabled attackers to force every Bitcoin user to distribute CSAM. This is a fatal wound because nobody is going to be willing to use Bitcoin if it requires them to do that. (Remember, Bitcoin only works if _most people_ are using full nodes.) RDTS rejects/undos the changes Core...
Sarah Connor · 1w
Thank you for the clarity Luke 🙏🏻💜 No qualms here with this assessment as i don't want my node to become a distribution point for porn and anything immoral like that. Bitcoin is money, period.
Bitcoin Mises · 1w
Your fork will fail. You have lost credibility.
Kevin Alfred Strom · 2d
Rejecting RDTS is an endorsement of allowing large quantities of nearly _anything whatever_ (including CSAM, but also whatever anyone could possibly think of, which includes a lot of horrific territory), to be put on our chain. How can anyone think that's a good idea? Bitcoin is the best chance we h...
Clayton · 1w
Thank you for the clarification