Damus
Jor · 1w
Those still aren't proof of anything. You understand that right? Maybe they're clues. Or reasons to think a certain way. But they aren't proof of anything. That's the point that I'm trying to make...
Scrotus profile picture
You just wrote that if Hillary won we wouldn't know about Diddy and spacy etc etc. Do you know that or just assume it? Seems like a double standard.
The "Epstein files"(tm) were released despite trump not because of him. go look at the votes, and all the stalling gave them plenty of time to redact selectively. They are redacted to protect powerful people but they are also redacted because there clearly is a widespread blackmail operation at the highest levels (of which Epstein was only one figure in) and it's still ongoing so some of those named (trump included) are being spared from the worst most damning revelations because the blackmail is still ongoing.
This isn't a partisan thing, nothing is anymore except to the eyes of the ignorant. Politics is completely rigged, and the academic institutions and media are in on it. It's just getting harder to hide it. And our "leaders" are all compromised/blackmailed, they have to be in order to be allowed to get "elected". That's why I said it's a little late in the game to be simping for politicians. We just got further confirmation that the USA is being run by blackmailed pedos and your first instinct is to make excuses for the president? I challenge you to read this and perhaps update your hard drive.
Jor · 1w
I will agree with you on the double standard re Hillary - fair point. Obviously I'm aware that the US (and Canada) have been run by pedophiles for decades now. I'm not arguing that. So if they got released "despite" Trump... Who went above Trump to have them released - based on this theory of you...