original source(s) first

The original. But I don't read it if the interests of the outlet coincide with those of Western imperialism.

Both 👍

Personally, I'd prefer the original. I'm well versed in critical analysis, and don't have any problem recognizing and filtering out bias while absorbing the factual content of the article. Also, the original provides an opportunity to see what the various sides believe, and how they view the facts. ...

I like the idea of the neutral with a summary, and if I am more interested I can read the original in full length

original

Original. So I know what I’m about to read and can decide if worth it.

Im for original as well. This way we can see whatever bias staring us in the face. Depending on who and what creates the neutral summary, it may still be riddled with bias. Better to see the ugly beast of bias in broad day than lurking in a dark corner

This is such a good question, really. First reaction is to say -original. But why this is my first reaction? Maybe Bc i think that I'd be missing out some important information that is stored in an original text? And what that important element would be? News is not a fiction, it doesn't require or ...