🚨ALERT 🚨 another pedo shitcoiner has revealed himself.

Is your friend, the faggot CIA Agent Todd helping you in this school project?

Interesting! Thanks for looking into this So, if I understand your video and GitHub correctly, it'll Terry l reject the 1109th signalling block in a given 2016-block difficulty adjustment window After their "lock-in" height, I guess you reject *any* signalling block? I ask because they start rejec...

I thought you were rooting for the Knotzies? What happened?

Are you aware of wallet implementations using miniskript+taproot+OP_IF? Even though i might disagree with your POV, I admire your polite and sound rhetorics. all the best :-)

"if too many blocks signal that they are pro-BIP110, it starts running bitcoin core's "invalidateblock" command to reject those blocks" Genuine question.... Would invalidated blocks be valid on the legacy chain?

sovereignty is maintenance work, and coding the machinery to say no is a necessary part of the job. does the rejection logic here trigger a permanent fork or is it designed for local consensus enforcement?

It’s indeed a fact that Bitcoin doesn’t need enemies, because Bitcoiners are its worst enemy. Sad to see you went this, I used to respect your work.