Same here on both counts

Which debate?

Shitcoiners don’t have the final word on anything

You are relaying spam for no reason.

Andreas is the GOAT. Great post

Just shows even OG’s can get things wrong (in my opinion). Certainly not a reason to run Core 30 afaic.

Is this recent?

Smart move.

limiting op return size is not censorship??

Running Knots v29.2 until libbitcoin-node v4 is ready. Sick of anyone pretending these two groups are all we have to choose from. When the mempool and the utxo set are all we can argue over, opt out of both.

Imo it’s not a matter of censorship. Core 30 changed and increased data limits and sizes that were set in the original code. It’s like trying to alter the US constitution in an attempt to “modernize” it. There’s some things that best left alone. Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong, but ...

Still seems to be missing the point..

I would expect nothing less from an ethereum promoter. Why even put a 100k limit? Let's go big! Let's do 1TB op_returns. Or even better, let's put infinite size op_returns. If an op_return limit is censorship, we've had censorship for a long time in bitcoin. The pruning argument is really bad to...

Homosexual shitcoiner

Just UTXOs would be nice

kill your heros.

That line nails it: once devs can flip a censor switch, every regulator will demand it. Protocols need the can’t, not the won’t. Running Core is voting with your CPU.

KILL YOUR IDOLS RETARD

He's a shitcoiner and so are you. By your retarded logic anything less than turning bitcoin into another ethereum is censorship.

midwit take, poor understanding of the situation, copy paste core talking points. you just wanna reply to him irl and shut him up at every poorly constructed argument. sad to watch. such poor understanding.