What part of Core's changes do you disagree with and what would you do differently

A solution is needed. I'm not technical enough to know what else to do.

Reasonable position. I was on the fence for a long time before deciding to run BIP-110. Both sides of the argument have had terrible public attacks on the other side. “Lesser of two evils” is a good way of positioning it. What finally tipped me over was the question of if not me then who? I want...

But what is the other solution Derek? 2 problems need a solution 1. The way core has been operating seems out of integrity and alignment with the principles and values of Bitcoin and Satoshi. 2. Node runners should have a choice of which implementation we run if the main software causes non-mo...

Apathy… you literally agree with the main issue of spam and that core is compromised yet don’t want to fix it. That’s some serious cognitive dissonance. No solution proposed… no actual reasoning of why the BIP is “bad”… you just think this issue is gonna fix it self somehow I guess l...

BIP-110 is temporary to give us time to think for better solution while at the same time avoiding the danger of having to worry about large toxic op returns ending up on chain in the meantime.

Yessir! I’m on that wave length. What is the solution? Until then: #runbip110 #bitcoin