Damus
TKay · 17h
He can take bitcoin to 0 if he goes mad.
CarteBlanche · 17h
Nobody can move the market like Saylor could, other than Satoshi. Realistically higher than 4% of coins considering lost coins.
Brunswick · 17h
Anyone owning 4% of the "world supply of money" is not good for the money itself.
Benking · 17h
Good. That means cheaper sats for me. I’ll keep stacking. 🧡
nodesy · 17h
is that a lot
fade2 · 16h
And yes it would dump the price but then it would spike like a jack in a box after the dump since the market is spooked by the MSTR stack concentrated risk.
Marius · 14h
4% is anti Bitcoin philosophy
₿luddha · 13h
no central bank ever held 4% of gold without people noticing.
Skater · 12h
At least he doesn't KYC Bitcoin on-ramps/off-ramps cause that isn't real Bitcoin, no? https://blossom.primal.net/98d3fa60b56641f506e97ce076efca64d5cb389a90d5b69b7bb17f8b5d4bbe4d.jpg
Cypherpunk BTC BR · 12h
Concentração de coins pode levar a centralização, comprometendo a privacidade.
fuckstr · 10h
if ya say so Mr. nostr:npub1a2cww4kn9wqte4ry70vyfwqyqvpswksna27rtxd8vty6c74era8sdcw83a who am i to argue 🤔 #asknostr #transexpert
Matt Corallo · 9h
I mean that is a really huge portion of “real” trading volume (ie not counting market makers making short-term bets or rotations from self-custody to ETFs).