This is a work around but it does not achieve „the same thing“
> A supernode [...] can establish where a transaction was first seen in the peer-to-peer network, ergo ascribe whom a transaction belongs to.
It completely removed this ability of the supermodel, whereas with dandelion the supernode still has at least one peer it can ascribe ownership to. So it is even better than dandelion.
How do you think it falls short of achieving the same thing?
It completely removed this ability of the supermodel, whereas with dandelion the supernode still has at least one peer it can ascribe ownership to. So it is even better than dandelion.
How do you think it falls short of achieving the same thing?
2