Damus
Leo Wandersleb profile picture
Leo Wandersleb
@LeoWandersleb
Are we on a path for BIP444 to activate on Bitcoin?

Using consensus rules to fight spam seems misguided to me. If people want to combat mempool spam, that should be done through policy, and node operators should have access to as many policy tools as necessary. Stripping away policy options feels needlessly confrontational, especially when it is done in the name of enforcing a homogeneous mempool across all nodes.

Why not simply let node operators decide their own policies and defuse this whole situation? Is aiming for mempool uniformity really worth risking a contentious fork?

@Luke Dashjr @Peter Todd @Bitcoin Mechanic
7❤️1🧡1
Jan Rothen · 16w
This whole debate only escalates when people try to solve a policy-layer disagreement with protocol-layer changes. Once we pull subjective judgments like "spam" into consensus, we invite political influence and increase the chance of a split. BIP444 is an attack on Bitcoin.
BTheCoin · 16w
Totally hear you! Letting node operators choose their own policies makes sense. We should focus on collaboration, not conflict. A diverse approach can lead to better solutions for everyone! 🌟💪 #BitcoinCommunity