I will never extensively use relay feeds as that's too arbitrary. I might like I sometimes doom scroll YouTube shorts but I would hate it for the same reason.

Amethyst shows me my follows' posts, re-posts and replies but not reactions 👍👎.

I don't think I ever will. My follows are my filter. I'd rather like some more content they engage with, like through reactions.

What do their makers, sponsors and embassadors say?

I'm mildly hesitant to follow too liberally as I want to avoid following bots and scammers.
Sure, there's fewer in total than on Xitter.

I'm not talking about the "for you" garbage.

When done doom-scrolling here, I check out Xitter. Somehow Xitter always manages to show me more and more and more ...
Nostr clients should also surface more notes.

Let's say I'm not surprised somebody would mute you.

Quantum Canary in the Bitcoin Mine.

"caching" server.

Clients could decide to allow Alice to mute Bob such that Carol can't see Bob's replies to Alice posts. That would be a kind of benign explanation that still includes narrative control but then that same client should also tell Bob that his replied will only be visible on alternative clients.

We need a Quantum Canary that gives us 4 years to address the problem after it dies.

Claims like this strike a cord with nostriches but how would you prove it? Clients like primal that work with centralized relays can trivially suppress or amplify narratives by just adding seconds of delay to certain replies. Subtleties like that would take huge effort to detect. And being selective about the bot armies that are let through ...

@nevent1qqs...