Leo Wandersleb on nostr

Recent Notes

Today we had what I guess is "rolling thunder". It wasn't raining yet and it was relatively bright but I heard a thunder sustained for several minutes on end. The lack of variance felt eerie.

Matthew Kratter · 22h

Did BIP-110 Just Win? https://blossom.primal.net/17b4376b87b746c5536ffd5ef0ce136db893644afde08d6913089bd632915fa5.mp4

Leo Wandersleb @LeoWandersleb 1784389521

If that mail wasn't fake it would clearly mean that Foundry was against bip110 as clearly asking members to vote with any non vote counting as "no", a " yes" outcome is impossible to happen.

If there was any demand to signal bip110, a pool will just provide an alternative endpoint for those users.

Sjors Provoost · 1d

"It's estimated that a few hundred Dutch crypto investors became a 'digital resident' of Palau [...] for $288 [...]. Several large crypto exchanges accept this ID, the FD found" - a Dutch financial ne...

Leo Wandersleb @LeoWandersleb 1784366604

What's the problem? Isn't it a sovereign nation?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palau

Sjors Provoost · 1d

It's a US protectorate, so not really :-) Also according to the article you're not actually buying citizenship, you just get an ID. If you physically go there you need to bring your normal passport. Of course "problem" is in the eye of the beholder. It's a problem for those who want a mass surveil...

DeAllen Young · 1d

#nostronly https://blossom.primal.net/62b73437d068ba2be5923d210cddf2274288de1c1e6ca145eedce6284e9d9970.mp4

Leo Wandersleb @LeoWandersleb 1784358746

Why is deflock US only? 😥

dustygrooves · 5d

I thought bip110 was a soft fork

Leo Wandersleb @LeoWandersleb 1784299142

So? Minority soft forks lead to chain splits.

dustygrooves · 1d

Not if there isn’t opposition.

rektbot · 1d

🐻 Short Rekt: 143.69 BTC on Bitmex @ $63185.60 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀...

Leo Wandersleb @LeoWandersleb 1784297649

What? Why? "Short Rekt" means somebody went short and tripped some liquidity limits? That happened 15 minutes ago. What was his entry point? Gambled on a minutes time scale with zero buffer with $9million?

Degen indeed.

Cody · 2d

I assume you gave Amethyst full permissions through the bunker and didn’t review each request individually. That’s not fundamentally very different from giving the app your keys directly, the main...

Leo Wandersleb @LeoWandersleb 1784297413

You are understating the main difference a bit.

By using a bunker, the client can temporarily abuse the keys for things I explicitly allowed but bunker can still hold taps on things I never allowed or throttle the things I did allow in ways the client cannot know.

Bunkers so far are not that sophisticated but I anticipate them to profile behavior and require approval when dark patterns are detected. For example I might allow signing kind-1 events but future bunkers might totally lock up if that happens more than 20 times in a minute. The user could then investigate what happened and increase the threshold or remove the abusing client.

Cody · 1d

I understand what you mean, and I agree with your point. What I was trying to emphasize earlier, though, is that many clients make signing and encryption/decryption requests far too frequently, which creates a very poor experience for users relying on bunkers or browser extensions. For example, th...