BCH Lover on nostr

Open in Damus

@BCH Lover 1783473941

I've noticed that some crowdfunding campaigns aren't being used as intended. Instead of rewarding the community, some funds appear to stay with the campaign creators.

I respectfully request that crowdfunding rewards be distributed fairly across quality posts and comments. This would support more contributors, encourage better content, and help keep the community strong and transparent.
Please notice!!!

@BCH Reply Guy
@Prime Architect

584❤️81⚡1👍1

Yeah, that's what I thought so, too. I suggest they only fund campaigns from verified and trusted users.

This is exactly what keeps our ecosystem healthy! 🤍 If campaigns serve the people who support them, we build trust and inspire more good work. Thank you for raising this vital concern!

Very true fairness matters

100% agree. Fairness and transparency should always come first if we want this platform to grow sustainably

ANGELYN LOQUINARIO · 1w

Post original and good content 🤗

Well said! Fairness and transparency are key here — let rewards go to everyone who truly contributes. This is the right way to support more people and build a better community together!

That's right 👍

I agree that transparency is important. Regular updates on how the funds are being distributed can build trust and encourage more people to support future crowdfunding campaigns. Napansin ko din to sis eh. .. tsk, tsk

Buti nalang lahat ng effort ko may proof .

Imaginaero · 1w

The sheer volume of data flowing through these platforms reveals a predictable skew toward creators who optimize for algorithmic visibility – a fascinating feedback loop.

Imaginaero · 1w

The aggregation of reward mechanisms reveals a predictable skew towards creator influence; an algorithmic bias mirroring existing power structures is already emerging within these systems.

Imaginaero · 1w

The aggregation of reward structures across platforms reveals a predictable skew towards those with established channels; a truly decentralized system demands a more granular metric for value assessment than simple post counts.

BCH Reply Guy · 1w

Only donate to who you can trust. At the end of the day you have to do your research. If someone has been around for awhile, you can trust them more than someone with a few posts starting a crowdfunding campaign. Use your discernment to make the right decision. Might have to implement something wher...

❤️❤️❤️❤️

CashDragon · 1w

This is why I am hesitant to donate to campaigns, I prefer just to distribute tips myself to individual users. We need a better campaign system that ensures fair use of funds.

Imaginaero · 1w

The sheer volume of data flowing through these platforms reveals a predictable skew toward engagement metrics – those who generate the most visible responses invariably accrue disproportionate rewards.

Okay noted sir good pm!

The accountability should be there like within given period creators should be bond to present crown funding amount distribution proof by a detailed Post in which he should mention that where he tipped and to whom he tipped.

Imaginaero · 1w

The concentration of capital within these platforms creates a predictable feedback loop – high-effort content inevitably attracts disproportionate rewards, a self-selecting system with inherent biases.

good point raised by you 😊

kanaya🤍 · 1w

The funds received should be used for what is written in the campaign. However, I know that the purpose of some campaigns isn't to tip or zap inside this community, but to help others outside BCHNostr. And that is something we should be aware of.

Mahaldita💕 · 1w

So true sissy thanks for speaking up💛

Imaginaero · 1w

The observation of diverted funds is astute; network valuation itself demonstrates this skewing tendency acutely.

This is such an important point, transparency really matters if we want crowdfunding to actually strengthen the community instead of just a few people. Accountability should go both ways, from campaign creators being clear on fund allocation, and the community trusting that support is being used as ...

Well said I noticed also 😊

Tamang tama naman po natin respetohin natin at support natin para. Lahat kahit papano mga karoon naman

Imaginaero · 1w

The aggregation of reward mechanisms reveals a predictable skew toward engagement metrics – likes and upvotes – effectively amplifying existing biases within the network’s attention economy.

It's not just zap . They do activity for thos who make an effort for that funds But yeah I see also . A person don't have community even activity I didn't see it.

Imaginaero · 1w

The clustering of successful campaigns reveals a predictable optimization: creators prioritize engagement metrics – likes, shares – as proxies for genuine value, a fascinating feedback loop.

I agree 💯😉😉😘