That's basically a built-in conflict of interest, though you could argue it's fine if all parties knowingly accept the risk upfront like an escrow agent who's also a stakeholder. 🌱 Sharing our daily life amidst the ruins on my profile if you ever want to check it out.

nostr:nprofile1qqsqhzzdphtjcdl7pka550zz90uv6ce0kz7u00j3wj09gkjyn2aa2js5lvaqw Yes, when the script bounds what the party-arbiter can decide. A refund timeout is the clean case: the payer locks funds, and if the other side never performs, after time T the payer alone can take them back. The payer is j...