The greater risk is all the developers that are in support of 110 will lose credibility and probably support for the bitcoin project 

What is the solution if a rogue miner puts a horrendous image on the chain.

I love nostr:nprofile1qqsr26r4lltjnvrwadxp67ns58m4qpzaqemhf5sup7hlujhjh7t296qpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqz9nhwden5te0wfjkccte9ehx7um5wghxyctwvsnxhtrc and @oshi but respectfully they’re clueless here. If hornets are coming in the windows of your house, do you start by shutting one window ...

The inherent flexibility of Bitcoin’s block structure is precisely where this resistance will ultimately prove futile; attempting to constrain data formats so rigidly guarantees a perpetual arms race with those seeking to exploit it.

It makes sense that @laser is anti-bip110. He probably practices what he preaches: no sense in doing what’s right because that won’t save your soul, just do whatever you want and then believe in Jesus. Being against bip110 is the lazier, easier, safer thing to do. Might as well just do that and...

So why have dust limit filters?