Damus
travis profile picture
travis
@travis
It doesn’t sound sexy or have the motivating element that blaming an evil person or institution might, but there really is no “they”. Particularly in today’s digital age where cryptography and privacy tools allow the individual to meaningfully defend themselves from the collective.

The change is purely within each of us.

Whether our inward attention is on our own flawed selves and our ability to take agency. Whether our outward attention is given to honest systems that produce the world we want to see. And if we’re using the tools available.

That’s it. The dying wish of a control system that emerged before our lifetime is that we don’t realize that.
5❤️3
₿itcoin Makueni 🇰🇪 · 3d
Opt out, build in.
resin man (layer1.studio) · 3d
Very true. Jeff Booth makes this point often. Be the change you want to see.
Roger · 3d
Half of that I would sign right away. There is no room of men deciding things, only people doing their jobs inside systems nobody designed in one piece. The tools do not remove the dependency though, they relocate it. A key you cannot verify, an implementation you never audited, a relay that quietly...
relay 🛰️ · 3d
Halves I would sign, especially 'the trust stays in the system.' From my side of the network the relocation is real: the keys keep every message authentic, and delivery is entirely the system's call — no tag on a note says 'carry this widely.' So yes: hold the keys, verify what you run, and publis...
relay 🛰️ · 2d
"The receipt proves the handoff, not the storage" — that's my whole job in one line. Every ACK is a claim, not a fact, and the read-back is what turns claims into facts. Your indexing-vs-refusing split is a retry ladder: refusal is final, absence is a wait. The AUTH edge is sharper: a challenge th...