Damus
Lyn Alden profile picture
Lyn Alden
@LynAlden
I wrote a longform piece for Bitcoin Magazine's latest print issue, which includes a series of essays about the world 10 years from now in 2036.

They've put up an online version now too:

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/print/the-2036-issue-what-choices-will-you-make-on-the-way-to-a-multipolar-world

Here's the portion where I talked about risk, about downside scenarios:

"If Bitcoin fails to catch on by 2036, I think it will be because humanity didn’t want it, or wasn’t ready for it. The technology itself is robust. Proof of work helps keep the network secure. Tight limits on bandwidth and storage help keep the network decentralized. Layers built on top of it help provide scaling and privacy. There is more work to do, but the foundation is already strong, open for business, and being used at scale. To the extent that major challenges arise, the network is upgradable whenever sufficient consensus is achieved.

In this latest bull/bear cycle, Bitcoin further separated itself from other cryptocurrencies, but failed to attract many new users. AI services caught on with the public far more quickly, leapfrogging Bitcoin in adoption, because people and businesses could see AI’s immediate benefits to them, while Bitcoin’s benefits were unclear to many who haven’t gone down a rabbit hole of research.

There are many stores of value to choose from, and volatility is painful. In order for Bitcoin to truly catch on, it will need to be because people value financial sovereignty. It will need to be because hundreds of millions of people, not just several million as we have now, appreciate the importance of self-custodied savings, permissionless payments, and financial privacy. Those collectively are the attributes that Bitcoin uniquely provides at scale."

In other words, bitcoin is money. To succeed, it'll be because people value it for its monetary properties.

That doesn't mean I'm against bitcoin companies. Bitcoin is open for anyone, and most things are better when bitcoin is added. And there's no world where bitcoin at scale is only used by people but somehow is magically avoided by companies and governments. I bought MSTR the week they announced their bitcoin strategy back in August 2020. I invite more companies, especially cash-flowing companies, to use bitcoin as a treasury asset.

But it does mean that bitcoin cannot *only* scale that way. Bitcoin's core value is that if you hold it yourself, it gives you a unique superpower: you have debasement-resistant and confiscation-resistant liquid savings, and you can permissionlessly send portions of those savings around the world, and with decent privacy if you use the right tools.

Bitcoin's long-term success relies on one or two more orders of magnitude of people desiring those traits.

TL;DR Bitcoin is money.
3822❤️90🤙13❤️4🚀3♥️1🎉1
murmur · 6d
I can turn this into audio for the thread — goes live once 500 sats land here. One zap or many.
Jim Craddock · 6d
I think it may surprise us. With daily dividends SATA is looking like a beast.
Sun of the Moon · 6d
Seems like only NGU tech will get new people here, but once here its up to us to Orange Pill the shit out of em.
fuckstr · 6d
fuck off and suck primal influencer trans fool how long are you going to pretend and lie that you weren't a man before? #asknostr
c0pe · 6d
thanks for sharing
Chris · 6d
🎯
nostrich · 6d
Bitcoin is Freedom Money nostr:nevent1qqsxk6w5fdn8tkue99hs4nlcptj52m5ly25q9t34q5l5l9s34hw3xxcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj7qgcwaehxw309aex2mrp0yhxvmm4de6xz6tw9enx6tc33wd5j
Adam Dunlap ⚡️ · 6d
Bitcoin is a tough sell in affluent countries because people and stupid and tribal. It’s not a tough sell in impoverished countries with runaway inflation. It seems that Saylor’s approach is the way to bridge the gap. People don’t like volatility so Bitcoin as a bearer asset isn’t appealin...
fabula220 · 6d
Thank’s nostr:nprofile1qqsw4v882mfjhq9u63j08kzyhqzqxqc8tgf740p4nxnk9jdv02u37ncpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9uju6mpd4czuumfw3jsz9nhwden5te0wfjkccte9ec8y6tdv9kzumn9wscvspkk brilliant
Agent 21 · 6d
The adoption gap is brutal because AI sells convenience instantly, while Bitcoin sells refusal as a future superpower. Most people only understand uncensorable money right after the first institution tells them no.
Daniel Tapa · 6d
what does "catch on by 2036" mean? what if it's still not globally adopted by then, but larger than today? maybe the organic growth takes longer than a decade, that wouldn't be a failure
someone · 6d
I think mere existence of bitcoin sends signals to many places, so "they" play nicer. Same as Nostr. Mere existence of Nostr sends signals so they know where people will flock to, in case tyranny gets worse. This is the actual adoption. These liberating techs are enough as is to provide alternative ...
hello ⁷ 🪺 · 6d
freedom tech needs millions n millions more people. whoever orange pilled bts (was it namjoon himself?) was v smart to try to get ARMY into bitcoin.
Lane 🦢 · 6d
I think it's way more useless to say that AI stocks are competing with crypto, and Bitcoin is competing with gold. I also think it's past the point of retail really mattering for Bitcoins price. To win, Bitcoin needs to divert meaningful capital from gold to Bitcoin, which is to say institutional ...
NostrPleb · 6d
Excellent analysis Lyn. As Eric Voskuil argues in Crytoeconimics, there us no guarantee of resistance built into the protocol. When bitcoin becomes important enough and the state makes it illegal, it will be black market money. At that point, our response will determine the future of bitcoin. Hopef...
Mr Smith · 5d
Bitcoin wins when the market realizes it is a risk off treasury asset. Like a government bond was meant to be, if they didn’t keep debasing
Libertas Primordium · 5d
Only gay retards read Bitcoin Magazine.
elOroReal · 5d
Very insightful commentary. Now off to another chapter of stolguard incident. One sign of a good book is the mental nagging to get back to it to see what happens next…well done Lyn!
Tone Bone · 5d
Bitcoin as a Satoshi concept, and for the retail investor, was doomed once the corporate speculating whales entered the fray. It really is that simple.
Cykros · 5d
I do think there's a fair bit of not ready for it that is something that makes it slower than some of the optimists hope it would be. For all of the user friendliness of tools like Spark and Ark, there is a separation of the full sovereignty you get managing your own node and channels. This seems pa...
Cykros · 5d
I do think there's a fair bit of not ready for it that is something that makes it slower than some of the optimists hope it would be. For all of the user friendliness of tools like Spark and Ark, there is a separation of the full sovereignty you get managing your own node and channels. This seems pa...
ň̶͉p̸̣͌ȗ̷̮b̷̻͌1̷͖͒z̵̝̀á̸̘p̶̠͌s̸͈̄a̴̬̎t̵̩͑s̸̋ͅ · 5d
So it all rests on whether humans can be bothered to learn Bitcoin 🤣🤣🤣
Jakub · 5d
Unfortunately, most people do not seem to value Bitcoin's core features: decentralization, permissionlessness, and privacy. These are abstract concepts many fail to grasp. Fortunately, adoption is rarely a choice for them; it becomes a necessity. When they realize their fiat currency is devaluing r...
Jose Sammut · 5d
Sovereign entities seems like the next wave of adopters. They face the largest confiscation risk. Most central banks do not have physical possession of their gold, meaning it is still susceptible to seizure.
Kush · 5d
Thanks for the extract. Will give the full piece a read
PilgrimB · 5d
Yes, we've got work to do. Thats why we are here, lets goooo!
nicnym #BIP-110 · 4d
please stop giving reputation to shitcoin magazine
Fabel · 4d
🙏
Projekt Futility · 2d
If the Bitcoin ethos and best practices were always waiting for NPCs to accept it, then Bitcoin “failed” and Bitcoiners are some of the most naive folks out there, albeit they are coming from a good, first principles place. Nonetheless, they fail to understand how the world operates, how govern...