Damus
Karnage profile picture
Karnage
@karnage
I don’t understand people who advocate for sun bathing without sunblock but then freak out about Bluetooth and WiFi radiation.

You do know you’re getting much higher risk exposure in the sun? UV energy levels higher than Bluetooth or WiFi AND has ionizing potential…
301❤️5🤙2❤️1🌞1🎉1🎯1
pnk · 92w
Never heard anyone say that
47 · 92w
Its true, most sunscreen products are poisonous shitcoins
psychedelic frog · 92w
Freaking out over Bluetooth means going back to using wired headphones, so I don’t get it either 🤣
BTCPhoto · 92w
Haha reasoning with this kind of people is useless
ElPistolero · 92w
They are petroleum products…
FilanysZ · 92w
Modedration is key, may it be with the sun or any other emmiting source. I found that most if not all ionization studies don't take in effect accumulated effects total of all the sources a person comes in to contact with daily.. Let's just say after doing a thorough scan of all my power sockets a...
Matt - Kind 1 Sisyphus · 92w
The only thing I might be concerned about is close proximity to emitters, but you'd have to be standing right in front of one on a tower for it to be dangerous I think (in terms of cell signals). Bluetooth and WiFi are pretty weak unless there's something I don't know.
Surfside · 92w
Is there anything outside in direct sunlight for 10 years that isn't beat down and faded? The verify part is right there ha.
Farside · 92w
Strong connection between the uptake of sunscreen and incidents of skin cancer compared to countries where sunscreen isn't widely used. And non-ionizing radiation effects are very much determined by frequency. Lower frequency EM radiation has a much deeper penetration ability. For example, Wifi pen...
🇵🇸 whoever loves Digit · 92w
But you have me muted while I neither advocate for unnecessary exposure to the sun nor the other things
Sydney Bright · 92w
Read my article on nostr about the benefits of sunlight? It explains some of this. You can find it in my reads. It’s also my understanding that the issues of EMF isn’t about UV
Parallel Structures · 92w
Two completely different frequences. One is natural, the other is possible a weapon, man made
Rusty · 92w
The problem is you are only trying to look at the picture from energy perspective. Yes, Man made RF radiation doesn’t have enough energy to cause thermal damage/break DNA bonds directly but that is not the only way these non native, non-ionising radiation can cause harm. The truth is that EMF re...
Dr Nathan Keiser · 92w
Consider reading a bit more, or asking questions that could close the gap in your knowledge base. Your argument is a non sequitur which doesn't contribute to your growth or the greater conversation. Cheers