I said what I said.
Now, do you see how unhelpful that statement was.
Perhaps I could say that talking around the subject with some details about the reason something is important would add value....
I would just say that your comment is like someone walking in the middle of the discussion between Carl Sagan and Stephen Hawking, asking what's going on, but telling them to not explain anything technically.
I can explain BIP 110 to you pretty easily. It is a soft fork proposal to tighten the rules of Bitcoin. including limiting OP RETURN 283 bytes, removing the validity of OP IF and OP ELSEIF. Setting limits on tap leafs of a depth of 128. and limiting certain tap scripts to 256 bytes.
Now if all of that seems like gibberish to you, that's why most people just leave it at BIP 110.
I can explain BIP 110 to you pretty easily. It is a soft fork proposal to tighten the rules of Bitcoin. including limiting OP RETURN 283 bytes, removing the validity of OP IF and OP ELSEIF. Setting limits on tap leafs of a depth of 128. and limiting certain tap scripts to 256 bytes.
Now if all of that seems like gibberish to you, that's why most people just leave it at BIP 110.
3