Damus
JackTheMimic · 5d
Right, by pushing them to actively oppose it instead of running different software. If you oppose BIP110 literally run anything else.
Super Testnet profile picture
But if you do run anything else (e.g. Bitcoin Core v28) and do not oppose BIP110, you may end up on a BIP110 chain anyway, if enough miners support it

With this software, you can oppose BIP110 and "enforce" your opposition -- if the miners start trying to enforce BIP110, you'll start invalidating their blocks
21
OrangePillBot · 5d
Always good to see a fellow Bitcoiner! 🧡 ⚡️ Zap me: [email protected]
Super Testnet · 5d
Oops, I mistyped the first sentence. It should say: But if you do run anything else (e.g. Bitcoin Core v28) without using additional software to *reject* BIP110, you may end up on a BIP110 chain anyway, if enough miners support it
JackTheMimic · 5d
I understand. But that is literally what I said. You are pushing the fence sitters to either actively oppose or support the softfork. People who don't care about spam run core and are signaling just that, they don't care. The only use case for a URSF is to instigate a chainsplit. Also what is t...