Damus
kc · 1w
I can see the logic on this one. So what is behind the curtain is… As long as nodes don’t move to Bip-110, then miners won’t and Bip-110 is dead before it launches. I thought the purpose of a ...
Rich Nost profile picture
Nobody was here for the UASF. It never activated on August 1, 2017.

What's crazy to me is that BIP-110 advocates are acting like this is established game theory when it's not. They think all the success parameters are in place for a repeat of a fork that never happened, and when they are missing hash rate and nodes with economic weight.
1
Rich Nost · 1w
(with, like what? 6 weeks to mount any credible threat to non-compliant miners?)
kc · 1w
In my case it isn’t a thought of automatic success. It is a case of ignorance on how things work behind the scenes, but a strong desire for Bitcoin to stay money. I swear if Core developers brought a solution to the public forum I would give it a long hard look and put the same amount of energy in...