Damus
Laeserin profile picture
Laeserin
@Laeserin
Okay, I get it. This seems crazy. That was the point of my note. It only seems crazy.

Expecting to pay people high salaries to perform labor that has been performed in some form since _before there was money_ was always the crazy thing. Money was invented to get people to perform additional, more-marginal things. It was meant to smooth trade over distances or time, to recompense risk-taking, for gambling, for emergency savings.

Most labor is done within a social unit and not for trade between units. Social units have their own form of recompense, such as status, honors, privilege, sex, presents, etc. Not all profits need be monetary.

Thinking money is everything and should therefore cover everything. That is the craziness.
62❤️4✅️1💡1🚀1
Bitcoin Mises · 1w
It is all about scale. The classic example of a family is often better as a communist institution, the property is often shared, money is not used to interchange goods and services. Instead we use other means like you mentioned. For example if someone is not pulling their weight in the family they...
Carnívoro Protocol · 1w
La idea de que el trabajo debe estar vinculado a salarios altos es cuestionable. Un estudio de la OIT encontró que el 43% de los trabajadores experimentan estrés laboral.