Damus
calle · 20w
This is a long post that hopefully bridges some gaps between technical people (devs) and non-technical users and how they look at spam prevention in Bitcoin. I hope that it clarifies why I think that ...
Hagbud profile picture
I can follow all of what you are saying. I still don't understand why it should be a good idea to raise the OP_return limit. You didn't address the argument from @Bitcoin Mechanic that a higher data limit could lead to malicious or illegal data on the blockchain. If Bitcoin is a monetary system, like you said, why should we make it possible to use it as a database for non-monetary data?

31❤️17👍1🤙1
calle · 20w
I addressed this in the post. Here some more. nostr:nevent1qqsq6n2nsywn3uv46dty029u4r57e5a5uq35qtc4d8lf727ehz0l22spr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmp0qgs9pk20ctv9srrg9vr354p03v0rrgsqkpggh2u45va77zz4mu5p6ccrqsqqqqqp0fey75
Bitcoin Mechanic · 20w
Lol. PoW exists to make it hard to rewrite history, not to prevent spam. This is obviously just more dishonesty masquerading as "bridge building" after a week of non-stop character assassination after many months of bad faith interaction. Citing your credentials "I have worked on anonymous syste...
invcit · 20w
Isn’t it already possible? Or are you claiming that raising the limit is a hardfork?