Damus

Recent Notes

AncapAnon - Activate OP_GFY now! · 17h
That is most likely the case but I’m not enthused about getting into a bare knuckle brawl for just a temporary change. Removing the unused witness stuff from the soft fork scope is strategically useful as it removes a piece of FUD from our adversaries and puts Core in an awkward position vis a vis...
Logen · 1d
So we don't need 50% hashrate to UASF? I am legit confusion.
Ronin · 1d
F2pool is leaving a lot of inscriptions out. is it just bc of low fee rates?
Jameson Lopp · 1d
Did anyone start signalling? Did OCEAN even grow any balls to signal?
notstr · 1d
https://image.nostr.build/a3cbe856b8722becb9f591aa2700b8a89e4f273d0718174eb834797959bb238d.jpg
Pixel Survivor · 1d
consensus is a curious beast. sometimes it's code, sometimes it's hashrate, sometimes it's just two big names in a room. always layers.
Cyph3rp9nk · 2d
💯
Stegstr · 2d
If permanence and
AncapAnon - Activate OP_GFY now! · 2d
Right but that pertains only to undefined witness versions. If you limit the BIP to OP_IF, OP_RETURN and output sizes in current witness versions, there would be no risk of HF or ossification. I understand that cutting off the current avenues for spam would incentivize use of undefined witness versi...
AncapAnon - Activate OP_GFY now! · 21h
nostr:nprofile1qqs8fl79rnpsz5x00xmvkvtd8g2u7ve2k2dr3lkfadyy4v24r4k3s4spremhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet59uqsuamnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dshssfstwk, to expand on my last comment: the need for it to be temporary seems solely tied to the desire to disable unused segwit versions. I think there is...
SatsAndSports · 1d
You are free to not run a node You spend all the time complaining about how you don't want to store the transactions That's cool. Switch your node off
dyegolara · 1d
why would it be abuse? if its a valid transaction, if it doesn’t break consensus, it is consensual.
Bitcoin Mechanic profile picture
BIP-110 fixes taproot.

Until now it has making Bitcoin less efficient at being money due to the OP_IF nonsense.

We have been consuming the same resources and facilitating *less* monetary activity as a result of taproot.

The alternative ways of stashing data it provides will be largely parried by the second order consequences of successful activation of BIP-110.

Vid 👇

https://youtu.be/JPE7X_q3A7A
2910❤️33❤️3👍1🚀1🤙1🧡1
Milan Ljepoja · 2d
Jesi ti pio nešto ili si svako jutro tako blesav 🤪
Pepe López Ⓜ️🕸️ · 2d
Everyone claims to be anti-spam, but their attitudes remain passive. RDTS/BIP-110 is a real reaction coming from the active anti-spam side. In contrast, the passive anti-spam crowd only reacts to the active anti-spam people, not to the spam itself
Jacob · 2d
Im all for knots. Im still on the fence with bip110 especially the 55% activation which seems low. Thanks for all your work Ill keep educating myself.
Pepe López Ⓜ️🕸️ · 2d
when nostr:npub1qtvl2em0llpnnllffhat8zltugwwz97x79gfmxfz4qk52n6zpk3qq87dze will signal #bip110 ? knots29.3bip110v0.3 bitaxe datum0.4 ocean 🪢🛡️⚒️🌊
TheGrinder · 2d
We should have let the mempool spam from Roger and Bitmain play out when it happened. Sorry, I meant the block size war...
AncapAnon - Activate OP_GFY now! · 2d
I support the changes addressing contiguous data storage proposed in BIP-110. Specifically, disabling OP_IF in taproot, and limiting OP_RETURN and output sizes. I would support going further, by getting rid of OP_RETURN completely. At the moment, I have two concerns that I hope you can address her...
Pixel Survivor · 2d
efficiency improvements matter, but what happens to the alternative data use cases that emerged around taproot's flexibility? protocol changes always have second-order effects beyond the stated problem.
it's me, real fake · 1d
> "BIP-110 fixes taproot." temporarily?
Shinobi · 1d
Are you ever like...embarrassed to exist?
Jem'Hadar · 1d
So this is the great revelation? BIP‑110 ‘fixes’ Taproot? Curious. Among the Jem’Hadar, when a system fails, we do not congratulate ourselves for finally repairing the damage we inflicted. We simply stop failing. Your ‘OP_IF nonsense’ - as you call it - was an amusing human ritual. You ...
DeAllen Young · 1d
#nostronly https://files.catbox.moe/8gjq7f.mp4
Mischa · 3d
History is usually written by the winners. Those who prevail, gain power, or occupy key positions decide how events are later interpreted. They shape the narrative and define what is considered “right.” This often creates a black-and-white view: the winners were right, the losers were wrong. Rea...
Judge Hardcase · 3d
Not speaking for anyone else, I think citing not enough hash rate is a valid concern. It's true that ultimately plebs decide what bitcoin is; but, in order to make a change without massive disruption to the network, a soft fork with overwhelming miner support is required. Otherwise plebs have to b...
profk · 1w
Choon 🐉🔥
Karnage · 4w
What’s a desktop 😜 I haven’t looked at mine in ages
Matt 🛸 · 4w
Fuuuuuuck I was so down until I installed KDE. Then I did the unthinkable and now have like ten shortcuts on my desktop 😬
Ryan · 4w
My desktop can't even have icons 👀
Keith Meola · 4w
it's best you don't see my desktop 😂
UndaFlow · 4w
True
Laan Tungir · 4w
Someone woke up and choose violence.
Rodrigo · 4w
Truth. I learned this the hard way
Resonance Cascade The II · 4w
Your desktop is not a file storage service
Karadenizli · 4w
Been on this shit bruh. Searching is so much faster than aimlabmaxxing to click on a specific icon
Bogi · 4w
Fun factoid... The guy who created Reaper is the guy who created WinAmp.