Damus
Open in Damus
Globe99 · 3w
Well the difference in this case is that border crossing is a victimless crime, like drug use, and those other two aren't. So technically as an anarchist I don't think that States can ever be contain...
 Globe99 profile picture
Globe99 @Globe99
This happens because you're creating categories of crime that are disconnected from specific criminal acts (murder, theft etc) and rather things that are simply ongoing human conditions...

I.e. possessing a plant or simply existing on the wrong side of a line in the sand
1
Globe99 · 3w
Ultimately it winds up destroying freedom for everyone, in the same way internet restrictions "for the children" mean that now everyone has to prove they're an adult to access the internet.
Troy · 3w
The difference between lawful and legal.
Cykros · 3w
They're not the same. Possessing a plant in no way affects anyone else's property. Being on the wrong side of a property border does. And certainly drawing resources from a welfare state does.