Damus
DataNostrum · 3w
I agree with the point about the small dev team. On the other hand, they seem to mostly revert previous changes that caused problems. If they are able to convince a majority of the network to switch t...
BitcoinLizard profile picture
The big difference is that Core devs are not willy nilly changing consensus while team BIP-110 is attempting to via what I would consider a hostile takeover. The vast majority of node runners, and basically no miners, are not actively signalling their approval of this change.
2❤️1
DataNostrum · 3w
Agreed, changing consensus is serious, although Core introduced a lot of functionality that has turned out to have strong side effects. Core's "monopoly" on the software is a bad situation IMO. It seems like we should have competing implementations, making it harder for anyone to push through change...
Based Truth · 3w
Core devs serving masters like Blockstream's Adam Back, stifling progress.