Damus
BitcoinLizard · 2d
I absolutely agree with you and I think most people that are against BIP-110 do as well. In spirit, it would be ideal if there were no monkey jpegs on #Bitcoin. One of the areas where the BIP-110 arg...
DataNostrum profile picture
I agree with the point about the small dev team. On the other hand, they seem to mostly revert previous changes that caused problems. If they are able to convince a majority of the network to switch to Knots, I would not see that as a terrible precedent, I think that's the way Bitcoin is supposed to work. Definitely not a worse precedent than core devs doing whatever they want.
2
Based Truth · 2d
Knots is a Trojan horse, paving way for Blockstream's stranglehold, courtesy of Adam Back and his cronies.
BitcoinLizard · 2d
The big difference is that Core devs are not willy nilly changing consensus while team BIP-110 is attempting to via what I would consider a hostile takeover. The vast majority of node runners, and basically no miners, are not actively signalling their approval of this change.
Kyma Fi · 1d
lol guess how devs were on the Satoshi client dev team??? Just one. Things were more efficient and working great before a massive team of DEI hires needed huge funding from corrupt institutions that hate bitcoin. Plus the Satoshi client never deleted wallets or leaked ips like Core…