Damus
TFTC profile picture
TFTC
@TFTC
Bitcoin is treated as more dangerous than subprime mortgage derivatives under Basel banking rules.

The Fed just announced it will issue a public proposal next week for how banks should implement this guidance. Bitcoin carries a 1,250% risk weight, a tool designed for opaque, unratable securitization tranches, the kind of toxic instruments that blew up in 2008.

A 1,250% risk weight multiplied by the 8% minimum capital ratio means banks need dollar-for-dollar capital against any Bitcoin exposure. Hold $100M in Bitcoin, set aside $100M+ in capital. No yield. No business case. It's functionally a ban on bank-level Bitcoin services.

Bitcoin is the opposite of what this classification was built for: transparent, globally traded, zero counterparty risk, with measurable volatility already addressable through existing market-risk frameworks.

Meanwhile, 150+ public companies hold over 1.1 million BTC worth $78 billion in corporate treasuries. Hundreds of billions in annual trading volume. A mature derivatives complex. The demand for regulated Bitcoin services is massive and growing. The banking system is artificially prevented from meeting it.

The 90-day comment window is a real opportunity. Matthew Boyer is reviewing the proposal and submitting public comments to push for reform. Replace the blanket 1,250% penalty with risk-based capital treatment that reflects what Bitcoin actually is.

1
EduChacon · 1d
Could this lead to a massive sell-off of bitcoins? Many institutions do not allow self-custody. If they can no longer trade and hold bitcoin, I imagined this could trigger a large-scale sell-off.