Damus
calle profile picture
calle
@calle
Elephant in the room: all Lightning infrastructure is centralizing around 1-3 companies that offer zero privacy.
359❀️27❀️3πŸ‘€3🧑2🍻1🍿1
nout · 22w
Acinq, Breez, Spark?
gal · 22w
What should we do then?
GrunkleBitcoin · 22w
So Alice -> Big Brother -> Bob?
Derek Ross · 22w
And most of the capacity sits on AWS or Google Cloud.
Asdf · 22w
But what about on-chain to ln swaps and vice versa. Doesn't that give more privacy?
Deepmarks.org · 22w
running a lightning node should be everyone's hobby.
Akashi Hyogo · 22w
Minibits, WoS, Boltz?
nostrich · 22w
Isn't that what bcashers criticised 9 years ago aka hub and spoke like big regulated banks?
Liberty NH πŸ¦”πŸŒ² · 22w
Normalize running your own Lightning channels
Cleveland Bitcoin · 22w
nostr:nprofile1qqsyyk92mh5u5fs9kxa33tw0hgn87ttzfjp55p59t3neaadz60alqagj8a2hd πŸ‘€πŸ‘†πŸ½
anonymous · 22w
Fucking A
Bond008 · 22w
Holy shit, that elephant is talking.
Diyana · 22w
Yikes.
Garrett · 22w
Wdym?
SpecieSnapp · 22w
I hate the privacy implications, but Breez SDK was the most efficient way for me to get an LN wallet into my app. I hoped accessing it through TOR and regularly rotating keys would work. But they block TOR access. As soon as you have a legally accessible entity operating a service, privacy will be ...
Rizful.com · 22w
I think this is 100% untrue. LSPs like Megalith do a huge amount of the routing activity. And there are dozens of small and independent players like Rizful. Also, since Lightning is private, nobody can really tell you where the traffic actually is…..
pookiebear · 22w
Yes. And that's enough to de-anonimize senders, even if they run their own LN node.
GummiS · 10w
What has @DarthCoin have to say about that?