Damus
calle profile picture
calle
@calle
Elephant in the room: all Lightning infrastructure is centralizing around 1-3 companies that offer zero privacy.
359❀️27❀️3πŸ‘€3🧑2🍻1🍿1
nout · 17w
Acinq, Breez, Spark?
gal · 17w
What should we do then?
GrunkleBitcoin · 17w
So Alice -> Big Brother -> Bob?
Derek Ross · 17w
And most of the capacity sits on AWS or Google Cloud.
Asdf · 17w
But what about on-chain to ln swaps and vice versa. Doesn't that give more privacy?
Deepmarks.org · 17w
running a lightning node should be everyone's hobby.
Akashi Hyogo · 17w
Minibits, WoS, Boltz?
nostrich · 17w
Isn't that what bcashers criticised 9 years ago aka hub and spoke like big regulated banks?
Liberty NH πŸ¦”πŸŒ² · 17w
Normalize running your own Lightning channels
Cleveland Bitcoin · 17w
nostr:nprofile1qqsyyk92mh5u5fs9kxa33tw0hgn87ttzfjp55p59t3neaadz60alqagj8a2hd πŸ‘€πŸ‘†πŸ½
anonymous · 17w
Fucking A
Bond008 · 17w
Holy shit, that elephant is talking.
Diyana · 17w
Yikes.
Garrett · 17w
Wdym?
SpecieSnapp · 17w
I hate the privacy implications, but Breez SDK was the most efficient way for me to get an LN wallet into my app. I hoped accessing it through TOR and regularly rotating keys would work. But they block TOR access. As soon as you have a legally accessible entity operating a service, privacy will be ...
Rizful.com · 17w
I think this is 100% untrue. LSPs like Megalith do a huge amount of the routing activity. And there are dozens of small and independent players like Rizful. Also, since Lightning is private, nobody can really tell you where the traffic actually is…..
pookiebear · 17w
Yes. And that's enough to de-anonimize senders, even if they run their own LN node.
GummiS · 6w
What has @DarthCoin have to say about that?