Damus
inkan · 2w
I would not have been able to implement Inkan without the use of blockchains. Is there anything objectionable about using them?
ChipTuner profile picture
Yes it requires the blockchain. Nostr "simply" needs a relay and an equipped client to function currently, in all types of topologies. Bringing in another dependency chain creates additional complexity and requires different topological arrangements. Presumably relays and/or clients would need to operate a node (or trust a node) somewhere in order to provide the feature. Right now nostr is fully independent, requiring no chain.

It's just a different model I don't think many would want to opt-in to.

As a part business owner in this space. That just added another server I have to maintain alongside my relay and client (distribution/api) servers.
2
Nuh · 2w
As a business owner you need to be more concerned about the bon-existent income and barely any users to even have hopes of income, not negligible costs.
inkan · 2w
The only modification to relays that I had to make was to have them verify and splice OTS proofs into the events they return. Here is a reference implementation: https://gitlab.com/inkan_dev/ots-enabled-strfry Inkan runs without operating a node, but I guess it has to trust some nodes along the wa...