Damus
Dependable Independent · 4d
I think you got me wrong. There is no "best" solution ... for me it could be best to travel with car, for you could be best to travel with cruise for other could be best to travel with train ... ther...
freemymind ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ profile picture
Yes it just seems very naiv to me, when people present their ideas as if they are facts as you do. Since people that belief to know something for sure already lost the opportunity to learn better.

I in contrary belief, that there can be better ways in doing stuff, than what I do or know. And this would still be true even if I dedicate my whole life to only one problem.

You said before it is better to create 1โ€™000 millionairs than 1 billionair. Better for whom? I do not even think that me or you created the billionairs in the first place. And I do much more belief that inclusive markets bring good results.

When a big coorporation wants to sell something, why not let them sell it on this market? I do not get, how exclusion of certain parties can lead to a better market.

I rather want an all inclusive market with transparent products. When someone offers a thing to a price I want, this can end in a trade.

You can decide personally to buy only from small shops, when this is your preference. But I would not say, that small shops or produces give a better life to most people. I like when we have a market of specialists and some dedicate all to produce one good in masses at a decent price.
1
Dependable Independent · 4d
Not sure how familiar are you with the world tax system to say this. It is better to have 1'000'000 millionaires than 1 trilionaire because the trilionare do not pay taxes. The do BBD ( Born - Borrow - Die ). In this system in eyes of the law they are broke all the time, they never have money to b...