who are we talking about here?
> Bill Gates and WHO peddle vaccines on dubious science. (@Based Truth's note)
And as response I commented, that this is a simplification, which does not help to understand the world and mostly based on narratives. And even a narrative, that does not really help someone to act accordingly.
I think good criticism comes with evidence. Displays studies and names their flaws instead of generalizing. When the statement would be true, it would be very easy to make an informed argument, where the studies to vaccines fall flat. But as far as I know, there is almost no medicine with better proof of effectiveness, than the most popular vaccines.
And as response I commented, that this is a simplification, which does not help to understand the world and mostly based on narratives. And even a narrative, that does not really help someone to act accordingly.
I think good criticism comes with evidence. Displays studies and names their flaws instead of generalizing. When the statement would be true, it would be very easy to make an informed argument, where the studies to vaccines fall flat. But as far as I know, there is almost no medicine with better proof of effectiveness, than the most popular vaccines.
2
