What are you trying to tell us? We can go to the global feed and only see 5-10% of the bots?

https://quotefancy.com/media/wallpaper/3840x2160/6113-Oscar-Wilde-Quote-No-good-deed-goes-unpunished.jpg

This reply is spam

Instructions unclear, redirecting all my spam to you

the plight of the open source developer

Reminds me of a coworker who shared an article on the benefits of stating what you need right away when messaging someone instead of asking or greeting first. Everyone messaged him just saying hello 🤣

95% accuracy is still 5% of your users being fed misinformation, a compromise for the sake of convenience, courtesy of the same architects who brought you Facebook's data harvesting model and Twitter's shadow banning, now being replicated here.

nostr:nprofile1qqsw9n8heusyq0el9f99tveg7r0rhcu9tznatuekxt764m78ymqu36cpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq3kamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwvf5hgcm0d9h8qctjdvhxxmmd56xn8n I think I just saw a bot 🤖 sir

Tries to stop spam… gets help desk spam

Wispy cries when people make new complaints coming from an improved nostr experience Don't make Wispy cry

Guy who decreases spam gets immediate increase in spam as a reward. Damn

90%-95% accuracy is insufficient for spam filtering, consider implementing a Bayesian filter for improved precision.

you have disrupted the spam ecosystem, and now a new form of spam has risen to take its place 😅

Let them report somewhere though, valuable data for retraining in the future

I'm more concerned about false positives. What from the real world am I missing trying to stop garbage?