Damus
Bill Cypher · 3w
Check the amount of Bitcoin people payed for and lost on both events. Centralized platforms are still more dangerous.
BitcoinSandy · 3w
Only the size, but this hit very hard to plebs stacking what they thought was a safe way
เธ เนเธฃtะณเนเธ เธ„เธขt · 3w
No difference.
xlv · 3w
two bads don't make it right
StackinBeets · 3w
I'm way past believing the incompetence angle. Ftx was planned, so was coinkite.
Hanshan · 3w
Theres a difference when you dgaf about trading but you DO gaf about security
nicodemus · 3w
No. And I made the same comparison to the wife. Every cycle, we have a lot of people lose a lot of coin due to misplaced trust. You can't trust much of anything in bitcoin. Even yourself. People gotta learn to think in layers of security. This one DOES hit a little different, though, because a lot ...
TKay โšก · 3w
Not really.
Daryn Cavalier · 3w
Ftx was implied counter party risk Coinkite was implied trustlessness
Contra · 3w
Different modes/methods with same outcome
Beerye · 3w
The trading loss is relatively more transparent.
Abstract Equilibrium · 3w
Consent. I do wonder whether their ToS covers liability for an entopy bug tho?
Don't Believe The Vibe ๐ŸŒฑ๐Ÿ‹๐ŸŠ · 3w
I have doubts they are bad at security by now.
leito · 3w
But I heard they have a super secure USB implementation, 2 secure elements, the traces on the board avoid side channel attacks What could possibly be wrong? Seems like very responsible thorough people
Eddie · 3w
It's both fraud. But about FTX we know for a fact now they lied AND stole customer funds.