Legal takedown notices are a state threat. The claim of "destruction of evidence" of crimes is also a state threat.
Pfft. Only because legal jurisprudence is currently mostly the purview or the state.
1. Damus is incorporated as a company recognized by a government.
2. Damus, as a corpetation must comply with laws in the state under which it is incorporated.
3. Someone filing a request for information under the current structure IS TO BE EXPECTED, even if it is ineffectual in this case.
I don't see that email as a "takedown notice."
Destruction of evidence is certainly a definition of convenience for agents of the state, but there's no reason to not request assistence with gathering information in a case of harassment and libel.
1. Damus is incorporated as a company recognized by a government.
2. Damus, as a corpetation must comply with laws in the state under which it is incorporated.
3. Someone filing a request for information under the current structure IS TO BE EXPECTED, even if it is ineffectual in this case.
I don't see that email as a "takedown notice."
Destruction of evidence is certainly a definition of convenience for agents of the state, but there's no reason to not request assistence with gathering information in a case of harassment and libel.
❤️1