By @ObviousRises
Because women fundamentally do not see the world objectively.
Females perceive reality from a *me* perspective. Its hard baked into their DNA, everything they think and do is in relation to themselves. For example its not about whether deporting illegal migrants is good for the economy or society (its not even about crime rates) to them its about "well how does this make ME feel" they operate on emotion and ego and will support anything that makes them *feel* good and reject anything that makes them *feel* bad.
This is why women don't think about Rome. You have to imagine putting yourself in female shoes. Why would I care about Rome? They are all dead anyways. It has nothing to do with me. Its not relevant. Not once does it occur to them that maybe Rome has parallels to modern society, or that its simply interesting.
Men make better philosophers because they are able to detach from their own egos and make observations, a man can see a fact like "different groups seem to have different average intelligence's" and he may not like that scientific conclusion but a wise man will accept it anyways, but give the same scenario to a woman: "People have to equal because if people aren't equal that's not fair and that makes me feel bad" its a completely different mindset.
To be clear, I'm not saying women are bad or even wrong for this (its how they evolved) because these traits are VERY GOOD in other ways, for example, a woman will feel worried about her husband, tell him to stop eating so much salty greasy food because his heart is fat and his blood pressure isn't good, and what will she do alone with the kids how will she take care of them. Here I cooked a healthy but tasty meal 3 times a day you must eat it we have to mind your health. Or "I don't want you riding that motorcycle with your friends doing tricks on the highway you will get hurt" etc. Its things like this that make women good nurturers and caretakers, ironically this is why feminism is such garbage, it teaches women to not do these things they are actually good at and instead "be like men" which translates to (when combined with the me mindset) "I will have fun no matter the consequences" which leads to women drinking, sleeping around and basically wasting their lives away (because they have nothing else now)
I cannot think of a single female philosopher, I think there were some (I know of at least one) but generally female philosophy is batshit insane or just highly egocentric. It varies of course. Ironically, true female philosophers are the LEAST LIKELY to seek fame/recognition and instead provide wise council to family friends and loved ones, because a woman wise enough to be a philosopher wont' have big egos in the first place, or simply are able to detach like men and be objective—its not impossible just rare.
That's why I think there aren't a lot of female philosophers.
Because women fundamentally do not see the world objectively.
Females perceive reality from a *me* perspective. Its hard baked into their DNA, everything they think and do is in relation to themselves. For example its not about whether deporting illegal migrants is good for the economy or society (its not even about crime rates) to them its about "well how does this make ME feel" they operate on emotion and ego and will support anything that makes them *feel* good and reject anything that makes them *feel* bad.
This is why women don't think about Rome. You have to imagine putting yourself in female shoes. Why would I care about Rome? They are all dead anyways. It has nothing to do with me. Its not relevant. Not once does it occur to them that maybe Rome has parallels to modern society, or that its simply interesting.
Men make better philosophers because they are able to detach from their own egos and make observations, a man can see a fact like "different groups seem to have different average intelligence's" and he may not like that scientific conclusion but a wise man will accept it anyways, but give the same scenario to a woman: "People have to equal because if people aren't equal that's not fair and that makes me feel bad" its a completely different mindset.
To be clear, I'm not saying women are bad or even wrong for this (its how they evolved) because these traits are VERY GOOD in other ways, for example, a woman will feel worried about her husband, tell him to stop eating so much salty greasy food because his heart is fat and his blood pressure isn't good, and what will she do alone with the kids how will she take care of them. Here I cooked a healthy but tasty meal 3 times a day you must eat it we have to mind your health. Or "I don't want you riding that motorcycle with your friends doing tricks on the highway you will get hurt" etc. Its things like this that make women good nurturers and caretakers, ironically this is why feminism is such garbage, it teaches women to not do these things they are actually good at and instead "be like men" which translates to (when combined with the me mindset) "I will have fun no matter the consequences" which leads to women drinking, sleeping around and basically wasting their lives away (because they have nothing else now)
I cannot think of a single female philosopher, I think there were some (I know of at least one) but generally female philosophy is batshit insane or just highly egocentric. It varies of course. Ironically, true female philosophers are the LEAST LIKELY to seek fame/recognition and instead provide wise council to family friends and loved ones, because a woman wise enough to be a philosopher wont' have big egos in the first place, or simply are able to detach like men and be objective—its not impossible just rare.
That's why I think there aren't a lot of female philosophers.
81❤️2❤️1🔥1🤔1🤙1🫂1
