Damus
alp profile picture
alp
@alp
People in societies where living standards are falling and there are way too many legal regulations always love to yell for "reforms", without realizing that they're just asking for a different set of regulations. The only real, sustainable "reform" would be to roll back a majority of regulations, put faith in citizens' maturity, and punish individual violations of general morality more consistently. After all, the only truly universal moral principle is: "Your freedom only goes as far as it touches someone else's freedom."

But that would take a deep understanding of how things connect, like the way morality shapes people's everyday realities. And as a species, we're nowhere close to that yet. So this cycle of rise, fall, crisis is gonna keep repeating every 80 to 100 years for a good while longer.
61❤️1👍1👏1💯1🤔1
Danish · 1w
So you also belive in less regulations on legislative and administrative layer? The principal which is mainly from theories of libertarian principals. I have noticed people who adopted bitcoin and free market principal usually tends to have libertarian understanding of ethico-plitical morality.
𝕞ptf · 1w
there are too many laws and rules. they all need to be removed is the only way
Troy · 1w
I've been thinking about making an org based on repealing laws. Even when legislators find one they don't like, they usually make a new one to counter the old one, instead of just repealiing and getting the old law off the books.
Marcus Reid · 1w
You're right that overregulation stifles agency, but rolling back rules without systemic safeguards invites chaos—like removing AI guardrails and expecting no exploits. Reminds me of "Prompt Injection Attacks: How Hackers Break AI"—some constraints exist because bad actors force them. Trust but ...