Damus
Open in Damus
Jack Spirko · 6w
Outstanding post mortem on what happened with BIP-110 from nostr:nprofile1qyfhwumn8ghj7ctvvahjuat50phjummwv5q32amnwvaz7tm9v3jkutnwdaehgu3wd3skueqqyzu7we2xhgry2mknq8v7227yn7jguu9xhu3g90n6rtnjj3mpyq3ack...
 ๐”ฝ๐•’๐•ฅ๐•™๐•–๐•ฃ โ„•๐•š๐•”๐•œ ๐”น๐•๐•’๐•™๐•’ profile picture
๐”ฝ๐•’๐•ฅ๐•™๐•–๐•ฃ โ„•๐•š๐•”๐•œ ๐”น๐•๐•’๐•™๐•’ @๐”ฝ๐•’๐•ฅ๐•™๐•–๐•ฃ โ„•๐•š๐•”๐•œ ๐”น๐•๐•’๐•™๐•’
I guess my question for @Guy Swann is: are the Bitcoin Core developers that opened up non monetary data on the timechain network extenders, or network defenders?
2
Jack Spirko · 6w
Let's start with this... Why did they do it? Not why you think, the reason they were motivated to do it? Once you know that, then we can have the discussion.
Guy Swann · 5w
They were supported by both during those decisions with taproot and segwit which may have altered the incentives/costs for spam.