nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpq29v4vvtw2e50x87p7c6p2w05fgsmt8207qg6q54gsvmxkwpcmqsq0vwjlp
I think everybody is "for privacy", but the point is that encryption offers "absolut...
@nprofile1q... There are no absolutes. Neither in privacy nor in justice.
Encryption is not incompatible with laws or justice. Weakening encryption, or enabling more surveillance of a vast majority of innocent people by mandatory device attestation *is* incompatible with a free society.
You live in a place with a government that is above average when it comes to trustworthiness, but please don't assume that this is the case everywhere.
Encryption is not incompatible with laws or justice. Weakening encryption, or enabling more surveillance of a vast majority of innocent people by mandatory device attestation *is* incompatible with a free society.
You live in a place with a government that is above average when it comes to trustworthiness, but please don't assume that this is the case everywhere.
1