The main falsehood in these claims is the assertion that a split would only occur if “malicious actors carried out a counter-fork.” A BCH-style counter-fork is not necessary. The following is sufficient:
1. Some nodes activate BIP-110.
2. Other nodes/miners do not implement it.
3. A block is mined that is valid under the old rules but invalid under BIP-110.
4. BIP-110 nodes reject it; legacy nodes might accept it.
Why are you misleading the community like this?
1. Some nodes activate BIP-110.
2. Other nodes/miners do not implement it.
3. A block is mined that is valid under the old rules but invalid under BIP-110.
4. BIP-110 nodes reject it; legacy nodes might accept it.
Why are you misleading the community like this?
6
