The main falsehood in these claims is the assertion that a split would only occur if “malicious actors carried out a counter-fork.” A BCH-style counter-fork is not necessary. The following is suff...
Are you still not getting what he’s saying? Were you not around for SegWit to see how history is rhyming?
If a chain split occurs because minority hash (less than 51%) signals for BIP-110, there’s a game theoretical asymmetry favouring RDTS winning even if it initially activates with 1% of the hash or less. Read this please before replying:
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/technical/op-ed-heres-why-all-rational-miners-will-activate-segwit-though-bip148
If a chain split occurs because minority hash (less than 51%) signals for BIP-110, there’s a game theoretical asymmetry favouring RDTS winning even if it initially activates with 1% of the hash or less. Read this please before replying:
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/technical/op-ed-heres-why-all-rational-miners-will-activate-segwit-though-bip148
1