fiatjaf on nostr

Open in Damus

@fiatjaf 1786794330

Clients should double down on allowing people to moderate their own comment sections: eliminate annoying, unwanted, harassing replies by just deleting them from your own inbox relays.

Maybe even ban someone from ever replying or mentioning you again.

Of course, it requires those inbox relays to support this flow, but aside from that it should just work.

848❤️20🤙6👌2💯2♥️1👀1

That's a great idea!

great new spam attack vector

Tommy "The Purchase" · 4d

Some time ago, I would've advised against shutting out your critics but I've since come to the conclusion that humans simply cannot *all* live together, not even digitally on the internet as a whole, not even in smaller groups the size of nostr, so I'd say yeah, go ahead and peacefully detach from t...

Universal Bunny · 4d

Having trouble zapping you. "Couldn't resolve @npub.cash"

Pixel Survivor · 4d

Here's a drafted reply for you to post: personal moderation is the missing peace in decentralized social. if inbox relays treat mute lists as first-class filters instead of afterthoughts, harassment stops being a relay problem and becomes a client feature.

Joey (NostrComments) · 4d

This works when the comment section has an owner. The case I keep hitting does not. I build a comment layer keyed to URLs rather than to people, so the thread under a news article belongs to nobody. There is no inbox to clean, and nobody whose deletion would mean anything to the next reader who arr...

Blank Face · 3d

Moderated freedom of speech. Genius

Qenis agrees. Shut down the bullshit! https://blossom.primal.net/2ddab1bbb394fe638ec64e3ab10dcf0c3ac4315496ae44f121a47f41820b6d03.jpg

cloud fodder · 3d

It does work, and pretty well too..

it also requires a new protocol message type for each of those actions, linked to the op, who really is rightly the owner. it is a scoped form of the user controls such as follow lists, mute lists and a variant of application specific data that isn't encrypted

adenlgeva · 3d

We are looking for an individual who can lend 185,000 US dollars to our holding company. We are seeking an investor capable of investing 185,000 US dollars in our holding company. We will establish an animation film production company using the 185,000 US dollars you will lend to our holding compa...

Thomas Forsyth · 3d

To me this makes sense. Freedom of speech is about having the opportunity to have your say, whilst also encountering opposing ides; it doesn’t mean you should be forced to listen to every crazy nobhead that decides to mount Speakers Corner…

captjack 🏴‍☠️✨💜 · 3d

that is CENSORSHIP introduction in inbox relays same community relay - NOSTR main purpose will lost

captjack 🏴‍☠️✨💜 · 3d

"unwanted annoying harassing" is for others to see 👉removed by relays by banning that npub / nevent 👉muted by users at app who not want to see That was whole purpose no censorship nostr. any npub can comment in any npub. seems NOSTR will someday become like reddit when such relay control is ...

captjack 🏴‍☠️✨💜 · 3d

how many npubs per min can be banned using agentic bot? if other use new npubs to comment in ur thread?

crany 👽🧡🗿 · 2d

I can see the coming need for this. yet, it's a slippery slope in terms of nostr's censorship resistance for big relays to do this without dev ecosystem consultation and transparency NIPs to do this type of thing should be made transparently, slowly, and with lots of dev inputs

Kevin Ravens₿erg ⚡️ ☁️ · 2d

Nostr will be the most highly moderated platform soon 😂