Because they are two completely different contexts lol You're comparing domestic property damage of a private party to damage of weapons factories during a war where the affected country was destroying other people's property. A war and conflict they started. I'm talking about a domestic issue where domestic inhabitants are violently destroying the property of others protected under the same rules of law. Those are very obviously two completely different scenarios if you take thirty seconds and a few brain cells to think about it.

This clearly isn't going anywhere useful and I've made my position clear enough. Peace