Damus
Freedom Tech Co. profile picture
Freedom Tech Co.
@Freedom Tech Co.
Instead of sending sats, we should burn them.

A verifiable proof-of-burn tied to a Nostr event is a WAAAY stronger signal than a regular zap. No one receives the sats, so there's nothing to dox and no way to game the system. It's just pure, on-chain destruction โ€” publicly linked to whatever you're trying to highlight.

The network still sees the intent and the cost, but without creating new balances or attack surface. And honestly, "zap" already sounds like something getting incinerated.

Burn zaps > regular zaps.
191โค๏ธ1๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ‘Ž1๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿค”1๐Ÿค™1
Laan Tungir · 11w
https://blossom.laantungir.net/09a4696de006d009e833c3b54394ca1acd7b42f882017052346670c622974004.gif
Neo โšก๏ธ · 11w
Ultrasound money? ๐Ÿ˜…
Felix · 11w
This exists, see https://notary.electrum.org/n There is also a "Notarized Notes" DVM that shows these notarized notes.
Bugtus · 10w
Well, a proof-of-burn goes to the miners, at least that's what nostr:nprofile1qqspqflat0pmtegvnqqdfz7g4nau9yxcnwzhcl8p24e22uzgcnq9trsppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj73h7976 proposes in his paper. So it's not permanent destruction of sats. But it's still a much stronger signal t...
Jacob | APTea · 9w
Genuine question as a privacy researcher, what about zaps inherently leads to doxxing? I mean, aside from having a lightning wallet linked to your account?