Damus
fiatjaf profile picture
fiatjaf
@fiatjaf
Coinjoins would never work if Bitcoin had mass adoption anyway. Samourai knew this, they explicitly didn't want Bitcoin adoption, just like the average corporate Bitcoiner also doesn't want adoption.
232❀️10πŸ€™5πŸ‘€4πŸ’œ2πŸ‘1πŸ’―1
KingArctan · 95w
So true.
NSA πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡²β˜‘οΈ · 95w
True, good that they got rekt. Now we can have mass adoption πŸ’ͺπŸš€ nothing can stop us
calle · 95w
The anon set if CoinJoins is too small right now, so in order for then to really be useful, a lot more people would have to use them.
jacke · 95w
Why would they not work? Due to high fees? Or something else?
mad_dentist · 95w
What’s with all the hate with samurai?
mattaroo · 95w
And so what is your solution? No adoption?
Thoreau · 95w
Average corporate cypherpunk would rather work on USD stablecoins than Bitcoin privacy
Cyph3rp9nk · 95w
Totally agree, with 100 sat/vB rates most coinjoins are no longer profitable, adoption will bring high chain rates.
superkruger · 95w
Scarcity > Privacy in Money
Stirling Forge · 95w
Samourai ignored lightning completely too, while it would have been the best post mix tool they could have implemented. Coinjoins have people spending millions of sats on privacy, and it would have been incentive alignment to see the sats you spend on privacy also open up useful channels afterward...
joe · 95w
Get 'em while you can!
Kaizen · 95w
Coinjoins and mass adoption are not mutually exclusive.
@Lassmiranda21 · 95w
And what do we do now?πŸ€” https://image.nostr.build/e76f1ea004f10b29e7f4f09db4771703ba75fe5e94a8afc615790308c858be06.jpg
Kruw · 95w
Not true. Cross input signature aggregation makes coinjoining cheaper than a single party transaction. It's a soft fork that's activating in 2 weeks.
Ζ‘Κ‰Ν«cΝ§ΠΊΝ­ΞΉΝͺΞ·Ν£ 𝕡𝖔𝖍𝖓 ⚑️⚑️ · 95w
Wrong they had privacy as priority not mass adoption it's different