Damus
fiatjaf profile picture
fiatjaf
@fiatjaf
Coinjoins would never work if Bitcoin had mass adoption anyway. Samourai knew this, they explicitly didn't want Bitcoin adoption, just like the average corporate Bitcoiner also doesn't want adoption.
232❀️10πŸ€™5πŸ‘€4πŸ’œ2πŸ‘1πŸ’―1
KingArctan · 108w
So true.
NSA πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡²β˜‘οΈ · 108w
True, good that they got rekt. Now we can have mass adoption πŸ’ͺπŸš€ nothing can stop us
calle πŸ’― · 108w
The anon set if CoinJoins is too small right now, so in order for then to really be useful, a lot more people would have to use them.
jacke · 108w
Why would they not work? Due to high fees? Or something else?
mad_dentist · 108w
What’s with all the hate with samurai?
mattaroo · 108w
And so what is your solution? No adoption?
Thoreau · 108w
Average corporate cypherpunk would rather work on USD stablecoins than Bitcoin privacy
Cyph3rp9nk · 108w
Totally agree, with 100 sat/vB rates most coinjoins are no longer profitable, adoption will bring high chain rates.
superkruger · 108w
Scarcity > Privacy in Money
Stirling Forge · 108w
Samourai ignored lightning completely too, while it would have been the best post mix tool they could have implemented. Coinjoins have people spending millions of sats on privacy, and it would have been incentive alignment to see the sats you spend on privacy also open up useful channels afterward...
joe · 108w
Get 'em while you can!
Kaizen · 108w
Coinjoins and mass adoption are not mutually exclusive.
@Lassmiranda21 · 108w
And what do we do now?πŸ€” https://image.nostr.build/e76f1ea004f10b29e7f4f09db4771703ba75fe5e94a8afc615790308c858be06.jpg
Kruw · 108w
Not true. Cross input signature aggregation makes coinjoining cheaper than a single party transaction. It's a soft fork that's activating in 2 weeks.
Ζ‘Κ‰Ν«cΝ§ΠΊΝ­ΞΉΝͺΞ·Ν£ 𝕡𝖔𝖍𝖓 ⚑️⚑️ · 108w
Wrong they had privacy as priority not mass adoption it's different