Lots to dissect here.
How do you envision any kind of propagandation of waves without a medium? You stated in your other post that MM was wrong about the aether, and I agree. The aether IS the medium...
1. EM waves don't need a medium to propagate.
2. Glad we agree on ether.
3. I'm not a quantum fanboi, just FYI in case you were thinking that. Dewey Larson is my physics guy.
4. "There's no math in nature, there are only ratios and pressure mediation". As a mathematician with an interest in physics, that's all math, so this quote seems to contradict itself entirely. The code of the universe is math. The waves that make up everything are just wave equations with each wave having a unique set of constants or bearing.
5. Regarding the bastardization of JJ's model: fair point. Many such cases exist in which the discoverer of a thing has a better understanding of it than those who came after them, especially when dealing with matters that are, for all practical purposes, invisible to the human eye.
6. Having said that, I'm not super up to date on the advancements that science has or has not made in terms of their understanding of the atom or its particles. As a general rule though, we do develop better tech over time and as a result of that tech, we can often see things that we couldn't see before so it's not unreasonable to suggest that modern scientists have advantages over JJ that could afford them superior observations. This is not mutually exclusive of JJ having a better model.
7. Regarding the "mechanism of operation" of the right hand rule...doesn't matter to me. I'm satisfied with predictability when it comes to scientific models. If the right hand rule gives me the ability to predict what happens in select situations, I don't need to go deeper. To what end? What's the benefit? Perhaps there is one, but functionally, I have what I need with the RHR.
8. Yeah, I've looked at water's bonding angle and quartz too. I'm not saying there's nothing there. I am personally curious about the idea of "resonant angles" sort of like resonant frequencies. Example: is 54 degrees somehow harmonious with water because of the role of octaves doubling and halving? Does the fact that the Great Pyramid at Giza has a 51.85 degree base angle which is super close but slightly offset from that 54 degree mark create a beat frequency that is a theta neural oscillation that induces kundalini awakenings in adepts trapped inside the Queen's Chamber sarcophagus experiencing sensory deprivation? These are questions I've wondered about, so I'm not poopooing water.
The thing is that water is made of atoms too, so my model applies to water and everything else. And I'm right, because everything DOES have a magnetic signature, albeit a very subtle one. And that's what one would expect from atomic electrons...subtle, weak magnetic signatures.
9. I don't know what counterspace means to you, but we occupy a mathematical "density" of reality. There are higher densities, and again, I mean that mathematically, not in terms of mass/volume in the physical sense of the term so, just as advanced warning, please avoid that conflation. As far as the spirit residing there, boy that's a long discussion. We can't have that discussion via text because I'm already eating that elephant by writing my book so I'd have to dump 250 pages, none of which was generated by AI, on you and I'm not doing that. If you haven't done so, I recommend checking out Once BITten 562 linked in my profile. It's a long listen but I bring science, language, and multiple religious and esoteric wisdom traditions to bear upon this subject. Hear me out. I've found the origin and science of the baptism ritual. I've figured out what was going on at Eleusis. Recently, I found a spiritual wisdom text that academia has dismissed that, as it turns out, is ancestral to one of the greatest archaeological discoveries of the 20th century. Within that discovery, I've found that the practice of Holy Communion not only predates the Last Supper and Christ, it predates the Essenes from whom Christ picked up the tradition, and it predates Mosaic Judaism itself as a practice of the Sons of Fire in Egypt. I've found the forefather of the Sadducee tradition. I've even found a couple of Deuteronomy laws that carry through all 3 generations of texts.
There are a lot of charlatans out there. I'll grant you that. But you have to concede that if someone did have a relatively undistorted perspective of spiritual reality, that could easily parlay into a less distorted perspective of physical reality. That's the path my research has gone and it has yielded results.
If you don't know about the importance of theta neural oscillations, you need to hear me out.
10. I've taught the Fibonacci sequence to many students. I've shared Fibonacci plant growth videos with people many times. Vi Hart's series of videos on that is awesome. They spiral to maximize solar reception surface area to maximize photosynthesis. If the leaves just kept sprouting above one another, the lower leaves would constantly be shaded, at least in part, and that's just not an efficient design. Natural selection played out on that. Spirals are more efficient which is why new leaves often sprout 360/phi from the previous one.
11. I don't buy that water is the only solvent that can bring about life. The reason is because to say that is an absolute negative claim. Boiling it down, the claim is "No substance other than water is capable of serving as a solvent from which life can arise." In order to support an absolute negative claim, according to the Philosopher's Burden of Proof, you, the claimer, would need to possess perfect knowledge of all things, including total awareness of all substances, and total awareness of whether or not there is life anywhere else in the entire universe that is not water based. And I'm pretty sure you would agree that you don't possess that level of knowledge so let's not pretend you do and maybe back off of the absolute negative claims. Those never go well.
12. "...poorly understood mystical crap with no basis in reality whatsoever."
You need to check out my research. Do you know about Itzhak Bentov? If not, please catch up on him. I bought his book just to read the appendix. His name, his words, his diagrams, etc. were cited more often in the now declassified Gateway Experience research than even Robert Monroe. If that sentence doesn't make you go "Whoa!", it's because you don't know enough about these people, this research, etc. Please understand that Bentov died in a "plane accident"...American Airlines Flight 191 back in 1979. He published his book in 77. In 83, he was heavily cited in what was, at the time, classified military intelligence briefings on the subject of paranormal espionage techniques now known as remote viewing. This was during the Cold War. The military sabotaged American Airlines Flight 191 for the sake of OpSec, ok? This is signal.
2. Glad we agree on ether.
3. I'm not a quantum fanboi, just FYI in case you were thinking that. Dewey Larson is my physics guy.
4. "There's no math in nature, there are only ratios and pressure mediation". As a mathematician with an interest in physics, that's all math, so this quote seems to contradict itself entirely. The code of the universe is math. The waves that make up everything are just wave equations with each wave having a unique set of constants or bearing.
5. Regarding the bastardization of JJ's model: fair point. Many such cases exist in which the discoverer of a thing has a better understanding of it than those who came after them, especially when dealing with matters that are, for all practical purposes, invisible to the human eye.
6. Having said that, I'm not super up to date on the advancements that science has or has not made in terms of their understanding of the atom or its particles. As a general rule though, we do develop better tech over time and as a result of that tech, we can often see things that we couldn't see before so it's not unreasonable to suggest that modern scientists have advantages over JJ that could afford them superior observations. This is not mutually exclusive of JJ having a better model.
7. Regarding the "mechanism of operation" of the right hand rule...doesn't matter to me. I'm satisfied with predictability when it comes to scientific models. If the right hand rule gives me the ability to predict what happens in select situations, I don't need to go deeper. To what end? What's the benefit? Perhaps there is one, but functionally, I have what I need with the RHR.
8. Yeah, I've looked at water's bonding angle and quartz too. I'm not saying there's nothing there. I am personally curious about the idea of "resonant angles" sort of like resonant frequencies. Example: is 54 degrees somehow harmonious with water because of the role of octaves doubling and halving? Does the fact that the Great Pyramid at Giza has a 51.85 degree base angle which is super close but slightly offset from that 54 degree mark create a beat frequency that is a theta neural oscillation that induces kundalini awakenings in adepts trapped inside the Queen's Chamber sarcophagus experiencing sensory deprivation? These are questions I've wondered about, so I'm not poopooing water.
The thing is that water is made of atoms too, so my model applies to water and everything else. And I'm right, because everything DOES have a magnetic signature, albeit a very subtle one. And that's what one would expect from atomic electrons...subtle, weak magnetic signatures.
9. I don't know what counterspace means to you, but we occupy a mathematical "density" of reality. There are higher densities, and again, I mean that mathematically, not in terms of mass/volume in the physical sense of the term so, just as advanced warning, please avoid that conflation. As far as the spirit residing there, boy that's a long discussion. We can't have that discussion via text because I'm already eating that elephant by writing my book so I'd have to dump 250 pages, none of which was generated by AI, on you and I'm not doing that. If you haven't done so, I recommend checking out Once BITten 562 linked in my profile. It's a long listen but I bring science, language, and multiple religious and esoteric wisdom traditions to bear upon this subject. Hear me out. I've found the origin and science of the baptism ritual. I've figured out what was going on at Eleusis. Recently, I found a spiritual wisdom text that academia has dismissed that, as it turns out, is ancestral to one of the greatest archaeological discoveries of the 20th century. Within that discovery, I've found that the practice of Holy Communion not only predates the Last Supper and Christ, it predates the Essenes from whom Christ picked up the tradition, and it predates Mosaic Judaism itself as a practice of the Sons of Fire in Egypt. I've found the forefather of the Sadducee tradition. I've even found a couple of Deuteronomy laws that carry through all 3 generations of texts.
There are a lot of charlatans out there. I'll grant you that. But you have to concede that if someone did have a relatively undistorted perspective of spiritual reality, that could easily parlay into a less distorted perspective of physical reality. That's the path my research has gone and it has yielded results.
If you don't know about the importance of theta neural oscillations, you need to hear me out.
10. I've taught the Fibonacci sequence to many students. I've shared Fibonacci plant growth videos with people many times. Vi Hart's series of videos on that is awesome. They spiral to maximize solar reception surface area to maximize photosynthesis. If the leaves just kept sprouting above one another, the lower leaves would constantly be shaded, at least in part, and that's just not an efficient design. Natural selection played out on that. Spirals are more efficient which is why new leaves often sprout 360/phi from the previous one.
11. I don't buy that water is the only solvent that can bring about life. The reason is because to say that is an absolute negative claim. Boiling it down, the claim is "No substance other than water is capable of serving as a solvent from which life can arise." In order to support an absolute negative claim, according to the Philosopher's Burden of Proof, you, the claimer, would need to possess perfect knowledge of all things, including total awareness of all substances, and total awareness of whether or not there is life anywhere else in the entire universe that is not water based. And I'm pretty sure you would agree that you don't possess that level of knowledge so let's not pretend you do and maybe back off of the absolute negative claims. Those never go well.
12. "...poorly understood mystical crap with no basis in reality whatsoever."
You need to check out my research. Do you know about Itzhak Bentov? If not, please catch up on him. I bought his book just to read the appendix. His name, his words, his diagrams, etc. were cited more often in the now declassified Gateway Experience research than even Robert Monroe. If that sentence doesn't make you go "Whoa!", it's because you don't know enough about these people, this research, etc. Please understand that Bentov died in a "plane accident"...American Airlines Flight 191 back in 1979. He published his book in 77. In 83, he was heavily cited in what was, at the time, classified military intelligence briefings on the subject of paranormal espionage techniques now known as remote viewing. This was during the Cold War. The military sabotaged American Airlines Flight 191 for the sake of OpSec, ok? This is signal.