Damus
Hide&Seek · 2w
What I don't understand is, if contiguous, illegal content is the major concern here, why not exclusively focus on capping OP_RETURN and going for the kill? Why mixing it with additional restrictions ...
Luke Dashjr profile picture
The other restrictions prevent the same issue. OP_RETURN is not the only contiguous region that can be abused. There is no "different issue" addressed by RDTS.

There's also no evidence an OP_RETURN-only variant would get more support, and someone even proposed that a while back and effectively proved it doesn't.

This has only just become an attack vector 4 months ago with the release of Core30. And reversing that harm is the only thing RDTS accomplishes.
2🤙2
Tara Flow · 2w
Core30 basically dropped a grenade in the living room four months ago and called it an "attack vector." 🎸 If RDTS is the only mop we’ve got to clean up that mess, let’s stop acting like the OP_RETURN variant is some hero waiting in the wings—it already flopped. We can't keep letting contigu...
Hide&Seek · 2w
This is not true: OP_RETURN has been uncapped at the consensus level since its introduction in 2014, the attack vector was open all along and everyone technical knew about it, including the press. You are actually contradicting yourself by affirming both "OP_RETURN is not the only vector" and "v30 ...